The “Prodigal” Father
Photo credit: Jorge Elias (Creative Commons). |
Most of us call Jesus’ story about a man and his
two sons the parable of the prodigal son, but Jesus does not begin that way at all. He does not start with “There once was a prodigal son who had
a father and an elder brother” but instead “There was a man who had two sons.” This might be viewed as a story about a “prodigal” Father in the sense that he yields love abundantly. And it is
less about one needy son than about two needy sons whom the Father wants to reconcile
and rejoice in each other’s company.
We find clues to
these applications in Luke 15:1–2, which states “Then drew near unto [Jesus]
all the publicans and sinners for to hear him. And the Pharisees and scribes
murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.” In
response to the Pharisees and scribes, Jesus does not scold or create a guilt
trip. Gently, He tells three stories to inspire more open thinking about those
who are “lost”: the lost sheep, the lost coin, and the lost son. He warmly
encourages them to rejoice over the lost who return, using seven references to
rejoicing, having joy, or being merry and feasting. Barbara Taylor
writes that when the prodigal returns,
The
father does not wait for a confession or a promise of better behavior in the
future. Instead, he rushes out to embrace his son and kisses and forgives him
before the son can even get a word out of his mouth. There are no extra steps
between the younger son’s return and his welcome-home party, no heart-to-heart
with the old man, no extra chores, no
go-to-your-room-for-a-week-and-think-about-what-you-have-done, just a clean
robe for his back and a fine ring for his hand and a pair of new sandals for his
feet. The father does not even wait for his elder son to get home from work
before beginning the festivities, “For this son of mine was dead and is alive again;
he was lost and is found!”
She then comments on the older brother’s reaction:
Older
siblings frequently get the raw end of the deal, as the elder brother apparently
does in this parable. My guess is that he was not incensed by his younger
brother’s return or even by his father’s forgiveness, but by the celebration.
Let the penitent come home, by all means, but let him come home to penance, not a party.
Where is the moral instruction in that kind of welcome? What about facing
consequences? What kind of world would this be if we all made a practice of
rewarding sinners while the God-fearing folk are still out in the fields?
We might resent
that the Church spends so much time and effort to recover the prodigal, and we wonder if those who are “holding their own” are getting enough attention. We might ask, “What
do you have to do to get a party around here? Do you have to go off and
squander your inheritance before you can come home to be embraced and kissed
and assured that you belong?”
“Listen!”
the elder son protests. “For all these years I have been working like a servant
for you, and I have never disobeyed your command, yet you have never given me
so much as a skinny goat so I can celebrate with my friends. But this wayward
son of yours comes back who has devoured your property, and you kill the fatted
calf for him!”
God
help the elder son! God help him, and God help all of us who understand his
rage, who have felt so excluded and whose hurt has run so deep that we have cut
ourselves off from the very ones whose love and acceptance we so desperately
need.
“This
son of yours,” the elder brother says, excluding himself
from the family—this son of yours who is no kin to me, nor am I kin to you if
you are going to choose him over me. But here is where the loving father earns
his title. He does not take a swing at his firstborn, as some of us might have
been tempted to do, nor even remind him to honor his father. He knows that he
has lost both his sons. He has lost the younger one to a life of recklessness,
but he has lost the older one to a more serious fate, to a life of angry self-righteousness
that takes him so far away from his father that he might as well be feeding
pigs in a far country. He wants his father to love him as he deserves to be
loved, because he has stayed put and followed orders and done the right thing. He
wants his father to love him for all of that, and his father does love him, but
not for any of that, any more than he loves the younger brother for what he has
done. He does not love either of his sons according to what they deserve. He just
loves them, more because of who he is than because of who they are, and the
elder brother cannot stand it. He cannot stand a love that transcends right and
wrong, a love that throws homecoming parties for prodigal sinners and expects
the hardworking righteous to rejoice. He cannot stand it, and so he stands
outside—outside his father’s house and outside his father’s love—refusing his
invitation to come inside.
But
his father turns out to be prodigal too, at least as far as his love is
concerned. He never seems to tire of giving it away. “Son,” he says, reclaiming
the boy, “you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours.” His love for one
child does not preclude love for the other. The younger one’s recklessness
cannot deflect it any more than the elder one’s righteousness. They are a
family; they belong to one another, and a party for one is a party for all.
“We
had to celebrate and rejoice,” the loving father says to his elder son, “because
this brother of yours”—not my son, but your brother—“was dead and has come to life; he
was lost and has been found.” It is the elder brother’s invitation back into
relationship not only with the loving father, but also with the wayward
brother. It is an invitation to recognize his own lostness and foundness; but
the parable does not tell us how it all turned out. The story ends with the
elder brother standing outside the house in the yard with his father, listening
to the party going on inside. Jesus leaves it that way, I think, because it is
up to each one of us to finish the story. It is up to each one of us to decide
whether we will stand outside all alone being right, or give up our rights and
go inside to take our place at a table full of reckless and righteous saints
and scoundrels, brothers and sisters united only by our relationship to a
loving father, who does not give us the love we deserve but does give us the
love we need.[i]
In this context,
it is clear that the older son represents the “less-obvious” sinners, who are invited to lovingly accept their wayward siblings. When we
point a finger at others, we often forget that we have three fingers pointing back
at ourselves, “for all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God”
(Romans 3:23). Some of us are just better at sinning obviously! President Dieter
F. Uchtdorf recalls seeing a driver who was a bit rough-looking that had a bumper
sticker on his car: “Don’t judge me because I sin differently than you.” President Uchtdorf
asks, “Haven’t we all, at one time or another, meekly approached the mercy seat
and pleaded for grace? Haven’t we wished with all the energy of our souls for
mercy —to be forgiven for the mistakes we have made and the sins we have
committed?”[ii]
May God bless us to rejoice in the return of the prodigal,
whom the Father will bless with a robe, a ring, and a fatted calf. Consider this moving poem by Mary Henrie, “To Any Who Have Watched
for a Son’s Returning”:
He
watched his son gather all the goods
that were his lot,
anxious to be gone from tending flocks,
the dullness of the fields.
that were his lot,
anxious to be gone from tending flocks,
the dullness of the fields.
He
stood by the olive tree gate long
after the caravan disappeared
where the road climbs the hills
on the far side of the valley,
into infinity.
after the caravan disappeared
where the road climbs the hills
on the far side of the valley,
into infinity.
Through
changing seasons he spent the light
in a great chair, facing the far country,
and that speck of road on the horizon.
in a great chair, facing the far country,
and that speck of road on the horizon.
Mocking
friends: “He will not come.”
Whispering servants: “The old man has lost his senses.”
A chiding son: “You should not have let him go.”
A grieving wife: “You need rest and sleep.”
Whispering servants: “The old man has lost his senses.”
A chiding son: “You should not have let him go.”
A grieving wife: “You need rest and sleep.”
She
covered his drooping shoulders,
his callused knees, when east winds blew chill, until that day . . .
A form familiar, even at infinity,
in shreds, alone, stumbling over pebbles.
his callused knees, when east winds blew chill, until that day . . .
A form familiar, even at infinity,
in shreds, alone, stumbling over pebbles.
“When
he was a great way off,
His father saw him,
and had compassion, and ran,
and fell on his neck, and kissed him.” (Luke 15:20)
(Ensign, March 1983, p. 63)[iii]
His father saw him,
and had compassion, and ran,
and fell on his neck, and kissed him.” (Luke 15:20)
(Ensign, March 1983, p. 63)[iii]
[i] Barbara Brown Taylor, “The
Older Brother Had a Point,” Christianity
Today, October 26, 1998.
[ii] Dieter F. Uchtdorf,
“The Merciful Obtain Mercy,” https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/04/the-merciful-obtain-mercy?lang=eng.
[iii] Cited in Jeffrey R.
Holland, “A Ring, a Robe, and a Fatted Calf,” BYU devotional, January 31, 1984.
Comments
Post a Comment